In the spirit of openness and transparency, my attention was drawn to
these papers because research of was cited.
On looking up the source , I was led to the other two.The first of the three recent works is an investigation of the role that sex of
requester and sex of sender might play in the behavior of passing the salt. In
this proposal for a research study, Minér anticipated an opposite-sex effect,
perhaps due to the factor of attraction. That is, salt passing would be faster
when a male asks a female than when a male asks another male, and would also be
faster when a female asks a male than when a female asks another female. This
paper also generalized the discussion of the passage of salt to the passage of
pepper, arguing that pepper would be passed more slowly than salt because it is
less common to shake pepper over the chips and peanuts that would be present on
the table in the experimental situation. It was speculated that pepper may be
more likely to cause sneezing than salt, interfering with response time. This
proposal was presented in some detail, with numbers backing up the predictions.
In the second publication, Minér et al. propose generalizing the work in
another way: to investigate the attraction hypothesis directly by
experimentally manipulating the attractiveness of the requester. This would be
accomplished by creating an extra-long nose for half of the conditions. That
is, the request is made by a person with a long nose or a normal short nose. My
work was cited because of the finding
that schematic faces with long noses were rated as less attractive than faces
with short noses. In addition, like Minér, Minér et al. included pepper passage
along with salt passage. It was speculated that the combination of a long nose
and pepper is special because together they might encourage more sneezing,
causing a marked slowing of response time over and above the two main effects. For more.....

No comments:
Post a Comment